QRs on Import of Dairy Products Removed

Consumers in India will now have a wider variety with the full-scale dismantling of the remaining import curbs at one stroke in the Export-Import (Exim) Policy for 2001-02 announced by the Government of India on March 31, 2001. It signals the domestic industry to shape up or ship out as they will have to compete with global players.

Quantitative restrictions (QRs) have been removed on the import of baby food, SMP, WMP, butter, dairy spreads, ghee, fresh and other cheeses, including processed cheese. These dairy products are among the 715 items on which QRs has been lifted. In addition, import of second-hand capital goods, including equipment, that are less than ten years old will be allowed without obtaining any licence.

The range of basic import duty on the dairy products listed is from 35 to 60 per cent (which can be raised to 120 per cent bound rate duty, if necessary). Any amount of butter and cheese can now be imported on payment of the prescribed customs duty.

The Exim Policy has also made it clear that all imported edible/food products would have to meet the conditions of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Rules, 1955 which are currently applicable to products that are manufactured and sold in India. They lay down the definitions and standards of quality for all food commodities. Some of the PFA regulations also deal with labelling requirement, the use of permitted natural and synthetic colours and flavouring agents. It is also mandatory to print the "best before date" along with the month and year. The Act also provides for sampling, inspection and confiscation of food items, along with prescribed penalties for violation. Compliance with these conditions is to be ensured before allowing Customs clearance of the consignment.

Also, all farm commodities and food items will also have to meet the Indian regulations covering health and hygiene. In addition, India's Ministry of Agriculture will issue a bio-safety and SPS (Sanitary and Phyto-Sanitary) permit that will have to be produced before the Customs Officer.

A Standing Group comprising Secretaries of Ministries of Commerce, Revenue, SSI & ARI, Animal Husbandry and Dairying and DGFT would function as a 'war-room' for tracking, collating and analysing data on some 300 "sensitive items of importance to the public". These include dairy products. Every month, the Government would publish a monthly statement about import-status of these items.

The removal of QRs, however, would not leave the Government of India completely exposed. It would still retain three options - import duties, anti-dumping steps and safeguard measures. In the event of unfair trade practices like dumping or subsidization of exports by other countries that may cause injury to the domestic industry, protection under safeguard provisions like the enhancement of import duty, re-imposing of QRs as per WTO regulation, etc, will be available.

The new Exim Policy also places emphasis on promotion of agricultural exports including an appropriate agricultural export policy and launch of Agri Economic Zones, besides extending the Exim schemes such as the Duty Exemption Scheme and the Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG) to the agro sector as well. Yet another step is the Market Access Initiative to underpin industry in R&D, market research, specific market and products studies, warehousing and retail marketing infrastructure in select countries and direct market promotion activity and buyer-seller meets.

Indian Milk Products Export Regulation Order

The Government of India has notified an order for regulating the exports of milk products from India that calls for subjecting them to quality control inspection prior to their export. These rules aim to help develop India's dairy export. It takes into account the demands and requirements of the world dairy market with the regard to such factors as quality, health requirements, management practices and processing norms.

This comprehensive order bears the title of "Exports of Milk Products (Quality Control, Inspection and Monitoring) Rules 2000" and has come into effect last month from December 12, 2000. 

It covers animal health, hygiene in milking production, collection, storage and transportation. It also specifies levels of residues permissible in milk products, microbiological criteria for milk products, packaging, marketing and labelling, storage and transportation requirements, as well as management of herds and dairy plant, employee hygiene and the like. 

These rules also mark an important step in upgrading the dairy trade within India and bringing about quality consciousness at all levels of dairying -- from producer to the consumer.

Reference: Indian Dairy website. For any specific details, please write to: news@IndiaDairy.com

বিশ্ব কবি তোমার সার্ধ্ব শতবর্ষে লহ প্রনাম 

RABINDRANATH TAGORE (1861-1941)

--------------------------------------------------------------

Tagore had written this poem back in 1896 when he was only 35. Samuel George's recitation of this Tagore's poem from Gitanjali is presented here under:

Tagore's song sung by Rabindranath Tagore himself. Presented here below:

ওসামা ও ওবামা কি একই মুদ্রার দুই পিঠ নয় ? ওসামা যদি ঘাতক হয় তবে ওবামা কি? বিশ্বের নিরোপরাধ মানুষকে নির্বিচারে হত্যা করার অপরাধে ওসামা সন্ত্রাসবাদী হলে ওবামা কি? তার বিচার বিশ্বের শ্রমিক শ্রেণী করবে কি? 

        Pakistani soldiers stand guard on top of the hideout where Osama bin Laden was killed. (AFP/Getty Images)

Osama bin Laden was buried at sea Monday after U.S. forces raided his well-appointed hideout in Pakistan, shot him in a firefight and spirited his body out of the country aboard a helicopter, U.S. officials said.

The death of the long-hunted al-Qaeda leader, who had eluded intensive U.S. efforts to capture or kill him after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks he ordered, triggered warnings Monday that his radical Islamist network or sympathizers could try to retaliate against Americans or U.S. interests.

It also served, U.S. officials said, to send a message to the extremist Taliban movement fighting to make a comeback in Afghanistan, where it had harbored bin Laden and al-Qaeda before being driven from power by U.S.-backed Afghan forces in November 2001. The message: give up hope of defeating U.S. and NATO forces, renounce al-Qaeda and join the political process.

Bin Laden was killed early Monday in Pakistan (Sunday afternoon in Washington) in what officials described as a surgical raid by U.S. Navy SEALs on his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, a garrison town 72 miles by road north of the capital, Islamabad.

In a rare Sunday night address from the East Room of the White House, President Obama said a small team of U.S. personnel attacked the compound, where bin Laden had been hiding since at least last summer. During a firefight, the U.S. team killed bin Laden, 54, and took custody of his body in what Obama called “the most significant achievement to date in our nation’s effort to defeat al-Qaeda.”

At the White House early Monday afternoon, Obama said: “I think we can all agree, this is a good day for America. Our country has kept its commitment to see that justice is done. The world is safer. It is a better place because of the death of Osama bin Laden.”

Speaking at a ceremony to award Medals of Honor posthumously to two Korean War veterans, Obama added: “Today, we are reminded that, as a nation, there’s nothing we can’t do when we put our shoulders to the wheel, when we work together, when we remember the sense of unity that defines us as Americans.”

The discovery that bin Laden had been hiding in a well-populated part of Pakistan, rather than a remote location, raised new questions about the extent to which Pakistan is cooperating with the United States in combating terrorism.

U.S. forces flew to bin Laden’s hideout in helicopters about 1 a.m. Monday (4 p.m. Sunday in Washington) from neighboring Afghanistan. Bin Laden was killed “in a firefight” after he and his guards resisted the U.S. attackers, a senior Obama administration official said. U.S. personnel identified him by facial recognition. Bin Laden was shot in the head, the Associated Press reported.

A U.S. official said the SEAL team quickly flew bin Laden’s body by helicopter back to Afghanistan, where it was positively identified. Then, the official said, the body was taken out of Afghanistan and “buried at sea,” in part because the U.S. government did not want an accessible gravesite that could become a shrine for bin Laden’s followers. The body of water where the burial at sea took place was later identified as the northern Arabian Sea.

মহান মে দিবস জিন্দাবাদ 

মে দিবস কি? কেন মে দিবস উদযাপন? আজ শ্রমিক শ্রেনীর কাছে মে দিবসের তাত্পর্জই বা কি? এই বিষয়ে রোসা লুক্সেমবার্গ, এলিয়ানোর  মার্ক্সের বিভিন্ন লেখা এবং ২ রা মে'১৮৮৬ নিউওর্ক টাইম পত্রিকাতে "মে দিবসের" ঘটনার প্রকাশিত রিপোর্ট নিচে প্রকাশ করা হ'ল I

Rosa Luxemburg

What Are the Origins of May Day?

(1894)

---

Written: 1894. First published in Polish in Sprawa Robotnicza.
Published: From Selected Political Writings of Rosa Luxemburg, tr. Dick Howard, Monthly Review Press, 1971, pp. 315-16.
Online Version: marxists.org April, 2002.
Transcribed: http://www.ultrared.org/lm_mayday.html.
Proofed: by Matthew Grant.

---

The happy idea of using a proletarian holiday celebration as a means to attain the eight-hour day was first born in Australia. The workers there decided in 1856 to organize a day of complete stoppage together with meetings and entertainment as a demonstration in favor of the eight-hour day. The day of this celebration was to be April 21. At first, the Australian workers intended this only for the year 1856. But this first celebration had such a strong effect on the proletarian masses of Australia, enlivening them and leading to new agitation, that it was decided to repeat the celebration every year.

In fact, what could give the workers greater courage and faith in their own strength than a mass work stoppage which they had decided themselves? What could give more courage to the eternal slaves of the factories and the workshops than the mustering of their own troops? Thus, the idea of a proletarian celebration was quickly accepted and, from Australia, began to spread to other countries until finally it had conquered the whole proletarian world.

The first to follow the example of the Australian workers were the Americans. In 1886 they decided that May 1 should be the day of universal work stoppage. On this day 200,000 of them left their work and demanded the eight-hour day. Later, police and legal harassment prevented the workers for many years from repeating this [size] demonstration. However in 1888 they renewed their decision and decided that the next celebration would be May 1, 1890.

In the meanwhile, the workers’ movement in Europe had grown strong and animated. The most powerful expression of this movement occurred at the International Workers’ Congress in 1889. At this Congress, attended by four hundred delegates, it was decided that the eight-hour day must be the first demand. Whereupon the delegate of the French unions, the worker Lavigne from Bordeaux, moved that this demand be expressed in all countries through a universal work stoppage. The delegate of the American workers called attention to the decision of his comrades to strike on May 1, 1890, and the Congress decided on this date for the universal proletarian celebration.

In this case, as thirty years before in Australia, the workers really thought only of a one-time demonstration. The Congress decided that the workers of all lands would demonstrate together for the eight-hour day on May 1, 1890. No one spoke of a repetition of the holiday for the next years. Naturally no one could predict the lightning-like way in which this idea would succeed and how quickly it would be adopted by the working classes. However, it was enough to celebrate the May Day simply one time in order that everyone understand and feel that May Day must be a yearly and continuing institution [...].

The first of May demanded the introduction of the eight-hour day. But even after this goal was reached, May Day was not given up. As long as the struggle of the workers against the bourgeoisie and the ruling class continues, as long as all demands are not met, May Day will be the yearly expression of these demands. And, when better days dawn, when the working class of the world has won its deliverance then too humanity will probably celebrate May Day in honor of the bitter struggles and the many sufferings of the past.

.........................................................

Rosa Luxemburg

The Idea of May Day on the March

(1913)

---

Written: First published in Liepziger Volkszeitung, April 30, 1913.
Published: From Selected Political Writings of Rosa Luxemburg, tr. Dick Howard (NY: Monthly Review Press, 1971).
Online Version: marxists.org April 2002.

---

In the middle of the wildest orgies of imperialism, the world holiday of the proletariat is repeating itself for the twenty-fourth time. What has taken place in the quarter of a century since the epoch-making decision to celebrate May Day is an immense part of the historical path. When the May demonstration made its debut, the vanguard of the International, the German working class, was breaking the chains of a shameful law of exception and setting out on the path of a free, legal development. The period of the long depression on the world market since the crash of the 1870s had been overcome, and the capitalist economy had just begun a phase of splendid growth which would last nearly a decade. At the same time, after twenty years of unbroken peace, the world breathed a sigh of relief, remembering the period of war in which the modern European state system had received its bloody baptism. The path seemed free for a peaceful cultural development; illusions, hopes of a reasonable, pacific discussion between labor and capital grew abundantly like green corn in the ranks of socialism. Propositions like “to hold out the open hand to the good will” marked the beginning of the 1890s; promises of an imperceptible “gradual move into socialism” marked its end. Crises, wars, and revolution were supposed to have been things of the past, the baby shoes of modern society; parliamentarism and unions, democracy in the state and democracy in the factory were supposed to open the doors of a new, better order.

The course of events has submitted all of these illusions to a fearful test. At the end of the 1890s, in place of the promised, smooth, social-reforming cultural development, began a period of the most violent and acute sharpening of the capitalistic contradictions – a storm and stress, a crashing and colliding, a wavering and quaking in the foundations of the society. In the following decade, the ten-year period of economic prosperity was paid for by two violent world crises. After two decades of world peace, in the last decade of the past century followed six bloody wars, and in the first decade of the new century four bloody revolutions. Instead of the social reforms – conspiracy laws, penal laws, and penal praxis; instead of industrial democracy – the powerful concentration of capital in cartels and business associations, and the international practice of gigantic lock-outs. And instead of the new growth of democracy in the state – a miserable breakdown of the last remnants of bourgeois liberalism and bourgeois democracy. Specifically in the case of Germany the fate of the bourgeois parties since the 1890s has brought: the rise and immediate, hopeless dissolution of the National Socialists; the split of the “radical” opposition and the reunification of its splinters in the morass of the reaction; and finally the transformation of the “center” from a radical peoples’ party to a conservative governmental party. The shifting in the development of the parties was similar in other capitalist countries. In general, the revolutionary working class sees itself today standing alone, opposed to a closed, hostile reaction of the ruling classes and their malicious tricks.

The sign under which this whole development, both economic and political, has been consummated, the formula back to which its results point, is imperialism. This is no new element, no unexpected turn in the general historical path of the capitalist society. Armaments and wars, international contradictions and colonial politics accompany the history of capitalism from its cradle. It is the most extreme intensification of these elements, a drawing together, a gigantic storming of these contradictions which has produced a new epoch in the course of modern society. In a dialectical interaction, both cause and effect of the immense accumulation of capital and the heightening and sharpening of the contradictions which go with it internally, between capital and labor; externally, between the capitalist states – imperialism has opened the final phase, the division of the world by the assault of capital. A chain of unending, exorbitant armaments on land and on sea in all capitalist countries because of rivalries; a chain of bloody wars which have spread from Africa to Europe and which at any moment could light the spark which would become a world fire; moreover, for years the uncheckable specter of inflation, of mass hunger in the whole capitalist world – all of these are the signs under which the world holiday of labor, after nearly a quarter of a century, approaches. And each of these signs is a flaming testimony of the living truth and the power of the idea of May Day.

The brilliant basic idea of May Day is the autonomous, immediate stepping forward of the proletarian masses, the political mass action of the millions of workers who otherwise are atomized by the barriers of the state in the day-to-day parliamentary affairs, who mostly can give expression to their own will only through the ballot, through the election of their representatives. The excellent proposal of the Frenchman Lavigne at the Paris Congress of the International added to this parliamentary, indirect manifestation of the will of the proletariat a direct, international mass manifestation: the strike as a demonstration and means of struggle for the eight-hour day, world peace, and socialism.

And in effect what an upswing this idea, this new form of struggle has taken on in the last decade! The mass strike has become an internationally recognized, indispensable weapon of the political struggle. As a demonstration, as a weapon in the struggle, it returns again in innumerable forms and gradations in all countries for nearly fifteen years. As a sign of the revolutionary reanimation of the proletariat in Russia, as a tenacious means of struggle in the hands of the Belgian proletariat, it has just now proved its living power. And the next, most burning question in Germany – the Prussian voting rights – obviously, because of its previous slipshod treatment, points to a rising mass action of the Prussian proletariat up to the mass strike as the only possible solution.

No wonder! The whole development, the whole tendency of imperialism in the last decade leads the international working class to see more clearly and more tangibly that only the personal stepping forward of the broadest masses, their personal political action, mass demonstrations, and mass strikes which must sooner or later open into a period of revolutionary struggles for the power in the state, can give the correct answer of the proletariat to the immense oppression of imperialistic policy. In this moment of armament lunacy and war orgies, only the resolute will to struggle of the working masses, their capacity and readiness for powerful mass actions, can maintain world peace and push away the menacing world conflagration. And the more the idea of May Day, the idea of resolute mass actions as a manifestation of international unity, and as a means of struggle for peace and for socialism, takes root in the strongest troops of the International, the German working class, the greater is our guarantee that out of the world war which, sooner or later, is unavoidable, will come forth a definite and victorious struggle between the world of labor and that of capital.

Eleanor Marx

Speech on the First May Day
Hyde park, 4 May 1890

abridged

---

Source: Eleanor Marx, Vol. 2, Yvonne Kapp, Pantheon, 1976;
HTML: for marxists.org in April, 2002.

---

We have not come to do the work of political parties, but we have come here in the cause of labour, in its own defence, to demand its own rights. I can remember when we came in handfuls of a few dozen to Hyde Park to demand an Eight Hours' Bill, but the dozens have grown to hundreds, and the hundreds to thousands, until we have this magnificent demonstration that fills the park today. We are standing face to face with another demonstration, but I am glad to see that the great masses of the people are on our side. Those of us who have gone through all the worry of the Dock Strike, and especially the Gasworkers' Strike, and have seen the men, women and children stand round us, have had enough of strikes, and we are determined to secure an eight hours' day by legal enactment; unless we do so, it will be taken from us at the first opportunity. We will only have ourselves to blame if we do not achieve the victory which this great day could so easily give us. There is in the park this afternoon a man whom Mr. Gladstone once imprisoned– Michael Davitt; but Mr. Gladstone is now on the best of terms with him. What do you suppose is the reason for the change? Why has the Liberal Party been so suddenly converted to Home Rule? Simply because the Irish people sent 80 members to the House of Commons to support the Conservatives; in the same way we must kick these Liberal and Radical members out if they refuse to support our programme. I am speaking this afternoon not only as a Trade Unionist, but as a Socialist. Socialists believe that the eight hours' day is the first and most immediate step to be taken, and we aim at a time when there will no longer be one class supporting two others, but the unemployed both at the top and at the bottom of society will be got rid of. This is not the end but only the beginning of the struggle; it is not enough to come here to demonstrate in favour of an eight hours' day. We must not be like some Christians who sin for six days and go to church on the seventh, but we must speak for the cause daily, and make the men, and especially the women that we meet, come into the ranks to help us.

"Rise like Lions after slumber
In unvanquishable number,
Shake your chains to earth like dew
Which in sleep had fallen on you–
Ye are many–they are few."

Mayday

Western Labor Parades

---

First Published: New York Times, May 2 1886, p. 2;
Source: http://womhist.binghamton.edu/iwd/doc2.htm;
HTML: for marxists.org in April, 2002;
Proofed and Corrected: by Dawn Gaitis, 2007.

---

Introduction

On May 1, 1886, working men mobilized in support of the eight-hour workday in cities across the United States. In this document the New York Times reported on the diverse ways that the event unfolded across the United States, with some employers insisting that they would not pay a full day's wages for eight hours' work. One consistent theme, however, was the overwhelmingly male composition of the demonstrators.

WESTERN LABOR PARADES
THE EIGHT-HOUR MOVEMENT IN CHICAGO.
STRIKERS MARCH THROUGH THE STREETS AND LISTEN TO HARANGUES, BUT NO VIOLENCE ATTEMPTED.

CHICAGO, May 1. – One good-sized procession, one small one, two small meetings, some gatherings too feeble to be called meetings, and less than 30,000 laboring men taking a holiday, either willingly or unwillingly, represent the first day of the era in which, it has been declared, eight hours shall constitute a day's work and 10 hours' pay shall be gotten for eight hours' work. The red flag has bobbed up here and there, some incendiary speeches have been made, and on one occasion the police have had to expel a crowd of 1,000 men in which the tramp outnumbered the workman from railroad property. No blood has been spilled, and the 1st of May has been more of a holiday than it usually is in a land where people get up and move upon that date. Opinion is divided to-night as to whether this is all there is to be of the eight-hour movement or whether it is a parade prior to an actual engagement. By far the most interested part of to-day's features has been furnished by the freight handlers, for they were the men who came into mild conflict with the police. The men held a meeting on the Harrison-street Viaduct early this morning. The speeches were good natured, but firm, and there was nothing to show that the men had changed their minds about not going to work till they were given eight hours' work and ten hours' pay. After the meeting adjourned the strikers made a tour of the railroad freight depots. Wherever men were found at work they were induced, either by arguments or threats, to quit. At the Lake Shore station the doors and windows were closed, but a striker with a sharp eye discovered that freight handlers were at work inside. The doors were broken down and a crowd 1,000 strong forced its way into the building. A couple of policemen tried to drive the intruders out, but, of course, could not. Capt. Buckley and a squad of men had better luck, and the crowd tumbled out into the street.

At the Wabash station a notice to the effect that the road was in the hands of a Receiver and therefore could not be safely interfered with [h]ad no terrors for the crowd. The Illinois Central and Northwestern (Galena Division) freight handlers were visited but not molested because they have made their demands and given the railroad companies until Monday to answer. The freight handlers on every road running into Chicago, except the two last named, are, therefore, on a strike, and declare that they will not return to work till their demands are granted. The railroad companies say they can not and will not grant the demands, and that the place of every freight handler who does not report for work Monday morning will be filled by a new man as soon as a man can be found. The companies say they will have no trouble in engaging new men.

The Mayor says he will furnish the new hands with protection. Many of the roads expect that the old men will return to work Monday morning.

About 10,000 Bohemians, Poles, and Germans employed in and about the lumber yards marched through the streets to-day with music and flags. There were two red flags carried at the head of the procession. At one point the procession and a funeral party came together at right angles, and there was a heated discussion as to which should have the right of way. The funeral lost. The procession rolled through the streets like a wave following a tugboat up a narrow stream. Both margins of the rush lapped into the fringing saloon, lapped them dry, and rushed out again, running a little slower for the detention. Some incendiary speeches advising that the torch be applied to the lumber yards were made. The other procession included 1,200 furniture men and wood workers, who were quiet and orderly. The freight handlers held a second meeting in the afternoon and listened to more speeches.

As nearly as can be estimated the men not at work to-day were divided as follows: Laboring men taking a holiday of their own accord (including the 10,000 lumbermen), 15,000; freight handlers who have struck, 2,500; carpenters, woodworkers, and other workmen who have struck, 5,000; men who are practically locked out, their employers having closed their shops indefinitely because of the existing troubles, 5,000; total, 27,500. This estimate is probably an outside one.

The temper of the crowds who watched the processions marching through the streets to-day was that of curious interest only. Here and there a bit of sullenness was apparent, and this in the eyes of some indicated probable trouble as soon as another working week begins. An amusing feature of the strike for a shorter day came out to-day in connection with the demands of the men employed in the breweries, who demanded 10 hours' work, 10 per cent. advance in wages, and free beer when they felt disposed to drink. The employers replied, granting an hour's less work per day without reduction of pay, and beer at 6, 9, 11, 12, and 4 o'clock, not more than three glasses to be drank, however, at one time.

FEWER HOURS DEMANDED

ST. LOUIS, MO., May 1. – The furniture manufacturers of this city formed an association last night and unanimously resolved to operate their factories on the eight hours per day system after to-day, on a basis of eight hours' wages. They also resolved that they would tolerate no interference as to whom they shall employ or how their business shall be managed. An Executive Committee of seven was appointed, to which will be submitted for settlement all differences which may arise. In case of failure to settle any serious trouble, a general shut-down of the factories may at any time be ordered.

All the plumbers in the city, 200 in number, quit work this morning. They made a demand yesterday of the bosses that they adopt the eight-hour system without decreasing their wages, beginning to-day. The employers considered it too short a notice and asked for further time to consider the matter, requesting the men to remain at work until they should have arrived at a decision. This the men refused to do and stopped work.

Several hundred carpenters attended a meeting of the Carpenters' Union last night to consider the eight-hour movement. It was decided that beginning to-day they should go to work at 8 o'clock in the morning, take an hour for dinner, and quit at 5 o'clock in the afternoon, thus being in service eight hours. No strike is expected to grow out of this action, as the bosses have agreed to the proposition and the men demand pay for but eight hours' work.

Two hundred men employed on the water works in East St. Louis struck to-day for eight hours' work per day and ten hours' wages. The city refused to grant their demand and will endeavor to procure new men to fill the strikers' places.

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind., May 1. – May Day has brought no general strike here among the workingmen, yet there is much unrest, and it cannot be definitely determined what will be done next week. Inquiry among the employers of the Sarven Wheel Works, which yesterday shut down until Wednesday, notifying their employes that they would give eight hours' pay for eight hours' work, and that all who wished to comply with those terms could return to work on Wednesday, discloses a general feeling of hope that nothing precipitating trouble or protracted idleness will result out of the present condition of things. In some of the departments requests for an increase in wages have been made and a few employers have evinced a desire to bring about a general demand for an increase in wages to the amount of from 10 to 15 per cent. and the inauguration of the eight-hour rule. This does not seem to be generally supported. "Men can't step out on the street now and find bosses asking them to take jobs," said one of the Sarven wheel employes to-day. "We get from $1.25 to $1.50 per day as day men, spoke turners make $8 and $10 a week. These are not high wages, but they are as high as can be paid, probably, in the present condition of things." It seems likely that quite 90 per cent. of the men will return to work next Monday unless the situation changes materially in the meantime. Employes say that a majority of the men would vote for 10 hours' work per day, as the firm had announced that wages would be regulated by the number of hours of work. Among the requests preferred by the men of the company was one for a 10 per cent. advance asked by the spoke assorters. These hope to meet with a favorable reply, but make no threats in case of refusal.

All of the employes of the Central Chair Company, 80 in number, went out on a strike this morning soon after the whistle blew. Last night a committee waited on the officers and asked for Saturday half holidays without decrease of wages. The firm was unable to grant the request and the men returned to work this morning apparently satisfied, but at a given moment retired in a body from the factory. They asked 57 hours' work for a week with 60 hours' pay, a concession granted in another chair shop. The men say they were not ordered out by the Knights of Labor, but came out on their own hook. The officers say the demand cannot be granted, which is in effect an increase of 5 per cent. in pay. After paying all obligations last year the company had a surplus of 4 1/2 per cent. To grant an increase of 5 per cent. in wages would virtually lead to bankruptcy. If the price of chairs should be advanced wages could be increased, but otherwise a general advance is impossible.

DETROIT, May 1. – The threatened strike at Grand Rapids is finally averted, and to-day is given up to a holiday there. The employers accept eight hours as a day's work with a corresponding reduction in wages on all workmen above $1 per day. On this basis an advance of 5 per cent is made, with the promise of as much more in two months. No question is raised over the employers' announcement that they will run their factories in their own way, employing and discharging whom they please. These matters are expected to adjust themselves.

There has been no difficulty in this city except in the breweries. Nearly all the workmen in these establishments are out for a reduction of hours, an increase of wages, and the enforcement of strict union rules. The builders and carpenters have compromised their difficulties by agreeing for a year on a basis of nine hours' work for the present ten hours' pay, and six months' notice thereafter of any change.

MILWAUKEE, Wis., May 1. – All brewers and maltsters in the city struck to-day. Not less than 3,000 men are affected.

LOUISVILLE, Ky., May 1. – In response to a demand for the adoption of the eight-hour system the Furniture Exchange to-day decided to shut down works unless employes would accept pay for eight hours' work.

WASHINGTON, May 1. – The eight-hour rule adopted by the various building trades unions will go into effect in this city Monday morning, and as most of the master builders and contractors are determined to resist the demand for shorter hours, building operations will be practically suspended until some compromise can be effected.

PITTSBURG[sic], Penn., May 1 – The furniture manufacturers having refused to grant their employes their demands for a reduction from ten to eight hours' labor per day, a general strike was inaugurated to-day. Nearly every furniture factory in Pittsburg[sic] and Allegheny City is closed and over 600 men are idle. Both sides are firm and there is no immediate prospect of a settlement.

The stonecutters in the two cities are also out for nine hours a day, but will return to work on Monday, the employers generally having conceded to the demands.

The carpenters will strike on Monday.

PHILADELPHIA, May 1. – The cabinetmakers refuse to compromise with the manufacturers, and a general strike will probably result. They demand that on and after May 8 eight hours shall constitute a day's work. The employes of the Hae & Kilburn Manufacturing Company were notified to-day that the demands would not be granted, and accordingly 30 of the 50 cabinetmakers employed by the company laid down their tools and ceased work. The rest refused to join in the strike. The company employs about 200 men, Mr. C. Kilburn, the President of the company, said to-day that he will fill the places of the strikers next week.

TROY, N.Y., May 1. – This morning about 300 Italians, employed by the Delaware and Hudson Company in building a double track between Coon's Crossing and Ballston, struck for an increase of wages. They have been receiving $1.10 per day, demanded $1.25, and were offered $1.15, which they refused to accept. After stopping work they tied red handkerchiefs to their pickaxes and shovels and marched down the track in a body to another place where a second gang was at work and induced them to join the strikers. A large number of Italians arrived from New York by boat this morning and proceeded to Round Lake to work on the railroad.

HARTFORD, Conn., May 1. – At noon to-day two of the striking gasmen returned to work for $12 a week, including Sundays. They struck for $14 and the keeping open of a door to the retort room, so that they could enjoy a draught of air. This opening cooled the retort, and Superintendent Harbison ordered the door closed, which order not being obeyed was enforced, first by the nailing up of the door and afterward by the bricking up of the aperture. The men, who had been getting $11 a week, then struck, but the Knights of Labor did not indorse[sic] them, and they had a hard time of it. All but the two named are still out, but it is expected that they will return by Monday. A meeting of all the labor organizations is called for next Thursday night to arrange for the employment of the unemployed persons in the building trades. It is supposed that the movement will be in the nature of a co-operative enterprise to put up small homes. Carpenters have been warned not to go to Bridgeport, as there is to be a labor movement there soon.

NEW-HAVEN, Conn., May 1. – Some of the dock laborers employed by the New-Haven and Northampton Railroad Company struck to-day for an increase from $1.35 to $1.50 a day.

BOSTON, Mass., May 1. – In this city the Trades Union of Carpenters, the Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, the Amalgamated Society of Carpenters and Joiners, and the Plumbers' Union – 5,000 men in all – have resolved to demand eight hours on Monday and will strike if the demand is refused. The Master Builders' Association, 200 strong, unanimously adopted a manifesto yesterday afternoon bitterly condemning the action of the workmen, laying the whole blame on the labor unions, and declaring that the demands cannot be complied with without disaster to the business and working men both, and that they will close up business rather than submit to any interference.

PORTLAND, Me., May 1. – All cigarmakers belonging to the union here are out, the manufacturers having refused to grant their demand for an advance in wages.

"সংগ্রাম - সংগ্রাম - সংগ্রাম" জয়ী হওয়ার জন্য, বেচে থাকার জন্য, অধিকার অর্জনের জন্য I আজ যখন সর্বত্র শোনা যায় ট্রেড ইউনিয়ন আন্দোলনের অসফল হওয়ার কথা, তখন Schreiber Dynamix Dairies Employees Union দীর্ঘ আপসহীন সংগ্রামের পথে ১০০ জন অস্থায়ী কর্মীকে পার্মানেন্ট করতে বাধ্য করলো কতৃপক্ষকে I লাগাতার আপসহীন সংগ্রামই যে শ্রমিক শ্রেনীর জয়ী হওয়ার একমাত্র পথ তা বহুবারের মত আবারও প্রমানিত হ'ল I শ্রমিক শ্রেনীর এই জয়ে আমরাও আনন্দিত I  সংশ্লিষ্ট সংগঠনের প্রতিটি লড়াকু সাথীদের জানাই সংগ্রামী রক্তিম অভিনন্দন I  মূল সংবাদটি নিচে প্রকাশ করা হ'ল  I

                      

IUF - Uniting Food, Farm and Hotel Workers World-Wide

Union at Schreibers in India obtains permanent jobs for contract workers

04-03-2011

The IUF-affiliated Schreiber Dynamix Dairies Employees Union, which represents 350 members, launched a campaign in early 2010 to rectify the systematic inequality and discrimination faced by contract workers. More than half the workforce of 700 was based on contract labour and of the 128 women workers at the factory, 125 were contract workers and only 3 had permanent jobs. The company responded with a series of attacks on the union, including suspending the union president and fabricating criminal charges against him, while bringing in powerful local politicians to stop the union. Management then terminated 200 contract workers.

In response, IUF affiliates in India mobilized in support of the Schreiber Dynamix Dairies Employees Union through the Dairy Employees Federation of India (DEFOI) and its fight against abusive precarious employment practices. Solidarity rallies were held across India, including actions by unions in Nestlé, Unilever, PepsiCo and GSK Horlicks whose branded products are made at the Schreiber Dynamix factory.

The IUF engaged one of Scheiber’s customers, Danone. As a result Danone asked Schreiber’s corporate US headquarters to explain the conflict. That pressure continues today with the IUF seeking further action from Danone in questioning the abusive practices of one of its suppliers.

While the union president still faces legal action, his suspension was withdrawn and he returned to work. Management has stopped its attacks on the union and negotiations have taken place, including the renegotiation of the collective agreement. As a result of negotiations around the issue of precarious employment, more than 100 contract workers have been made permanent. Meanwhile the union, with the support of DEFOI and the IUF India office, continues to fight for the reinstatement of the remaining 100 contract workers who were terminated during the protest rallies calling for the right to permanent jobs.

(২৮শে এপ্রিল'২০১১ পুরুলিয়া অস্ত্র বর্ষণ বিষয়ে এক বিস্ফোরক তথ্য প্রকাশ করেছে "টাইমস নাও" সংবাদ সংস্থা I এই বিষয়ে প্রকাশিত উপর্যপুরি তিনটি সম্পূর্ণ সংবাদ, আমরাও পর পর বিনা অনুবাদে হুবহু প্রকাশ করলাম)      

Purulia armsdrop case: 'Indian Government involved'

28 Apr 2011, 1255 hrs IST, AGENCIES

It's the second stunning disclosure in the 1995 Purulia arms drop case. Peter Bleach, a British citizen who served a sentence for his role in the arms drop has spoken to TIMES NOW. Bleach not only confirms that Indian politicians were involved, but also makes more startling revelations about what happened in the wee hours of December 18 1995. TIMES NOW: First question is why are you speaking out now? PETER BLEACH: Well because after so many years I thought this was all finished and done and I wasn’t happy about the outcome. But suddenly, out of the blue, India seems to want Neils Christien Neilsen or Kim Davy or Neils Holck or whatever his true name is, they seem to want him back in India. So all of a sudden, this has come back and my life has been disrupted yet again. It is high time the truth was told. TIMES NOW: How will your life get disrupted if Kim Davy is extradited to India? PETER BLEACH: Well good example ..Were talking together now and instead of me being at work, Im talking to you on Skype about this. It is a thing that doesn’t get left alone by the Press. You know, there is not a country in the world that hasn’t printed my photograph with a label of terrorist underneath it. Now I have never been a terrorist. Most people don’t believe that. So time has come to clear my name. It is not a funny label to have against you after the events of 9/11 and things like that. TIMES NOW: What was your role in the Purulia arms drop? PETER BLEACH: I was approached as a businessman. It is common knowledge that I was in the defence industry. I was approached to sell somebody some arms and ammunition and when I discovered this was an illegal deal, this was supporting a terrorist group in India, I immediately reported that to the British Government. And I was interviewed by the MI5 who passed all the information back to India. I was told that the Indian Government wanted the guns delivered into India so they could arrest the people concerned and find out who the guns were for. TIMES NOW: SO you’re saying you told the local police, they informed the MI5, which is the British intelligence agency. In other words, the British Government knew about it and yet you came along with this plane. And you’re saying this was some sort of sting operation that you were trying to carry out, that you would come on the plane and help authorities catch the other people red handed. Now that’s a fairly long winded explanation Mr. Bleach. PETER BLEACH: Well, you might say so. I have to say that it was never part of the plan that I would have been on that aircraft. That was due to circumstances beyond anybody’s control much later on. But I’ve got a copy of all the notes taken by the MI5 officer and the special branch officer who visited me and it contains the full details they passed to India. SO whether or not I ended up on the place is one aspect. Of course I wish I hadn’t been, but I couldn’t do anything about that. But that doesn’t alter the fact that the Indian Government had absolute full and detailed knowledge of every part of this. And my understanding is, in fact, the Indian Government actually supported the whole thing. It was an Indian Government job. TIMES NOW: If it was an Indian Government job and the Indian Government supported it, why would anyone in the Indian government allow the dropping of such a large cache of arms in Indian Territory in such an illegal manner? Whats the motive? PETER BLEACH: To understand that you have to stop thinking of Indian territory. This wasn’t dropped so much in Indian territory as in Bengali territory. The target here was the Government of West Bengal. At that time, Jyoti Basu was the Chief Minister and the CPIM Government was in power. The whole objective, my understanding was to destabilize the Government of West Bengal so that Presidents rule could be declared in terms of the Constitution and the state would have been ruled directly from Delhi. That could have disposed the CPIM Government and that was the entire purpose of the job as I understand it now. I didnt understand it at that time and I have to stress that.

Purulia arms drop: BJP awaits Govt's explanation

28 Apr 2011, 1828 hrs IST

It is an all out political war after the Purulia arms drop kingpin Kim Davy made shocking revelations on TIMES NOW. The BJP has called the revelations shocking and depressing and said the Government owes an explanation to the nation on the ISI link to Kim Davy. Meanwhile, Congress has demanded that BJP must explain why Peter Bleach was let off in 2004. TIMES NOW: Fresh revelations have come to light in Purulia arms drop case, what is BJP's view? Is it justifiable for central Govt at that point to conspire with Govt of another country to destabilizes a democratically elected Govt in West Bengal? Ravi Shankar Prasad, BJP general secretary said, “Whatever I have learnt to is what TIMES NOW is showing. It presents a very depressing scenario of about our political culture existing at the time. Obviously we have our reservations about Leftist Govt of Bengal but how can Govt at Centre permit the collusion between two intelligence agencies to permit the dropping of arms intended to destabilise any democractically elected govt. If that is true, it is very depressing, very disturbing and deeply condemnable. Cong questions BJP's motives  After Peter Bleach and Kay Davis claim Government's direct involvement, political blame game begins. Congress spokesperson Jayanti Natarajan alleges the BJP Government allowed Purulia accused Peter Bleach to get away in February 2004. Salman Khurshid, the then MoS, MEA when the Purulia arms dropping took place, said he cannot recall what happened then and whatever that needs to be said will be done by the cabinet secretary. Purulia arms drop: The enemy within?  In the wee hours of December 18, 1995 a mysterious weapon consignment was dropped from the sky over Joupur Jhalda area under Purulia Disctrict of West Bengal. The consignment was discovered the next morning. Until now nobody knew what really happened. 16 years after the controversial Purulia armsdrop, TIMES NOW has explosive revelations from two men who know possibly more about the mystery than anybody else -- Kim Davy and Peter Bleach. Purulia armsdrop accused Kim Davy speaks exclusively to TIMES NOW, 16 years after the controversial armsdrop. He makes explosive revelations. Kim Davy says political forces were behind the armsdrop, says people in the then government saw and approved the arms drop plan. TIMES NOW accesses document to show links between Kay Davis' air cargo company and the ISI. TIMES NOW has exclusive documents that prove that Kim Davy-run company had Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Karachi based Shaheen Aviation. Kim Davy's company Carol Air Services owned AN-26 plane that dropped arms over Purulia. Davy's company had a MoU with Shaheen airlines, which is known to be the front company for the ISI. At Karachi, the plane that dropped the arms over Purulia was serviced by the ISI front company Shaheen Aviation. Questions emerge over why an ISI linked aviation company serviced the plane that dropped arms over Purulia in 1995. In a stunning disclosure in the arms drop case, Peter Bleach, a British citizen, who served a sentence for his role in the arms drop has spoken to TIMES NOW. Bleach not only confirms that Indian politicians were involved, but also makes more startling revelations about what happened on the night of December 18, 1995.